Everything a result needs, in one team
Revenue recovery, AI products, AI content, search, analytics, platforms and integrations.
Blog / Category
How we work
Our process: diagnosing with data, shipping small reviewed changes, and reporting every week.
Fast and careful are usually traded off. In our work they come from the same habits: diagnose with data before changing anything, test on a full copy, ship small reviewed changes, and report every week what changed, what it did and what is still unproven.
These notes are the practices behind our results, written so you can use them on your own projects, with or without us.
This is for you if
- You want a partner who reports facts, not forecasts
- You have been burned by a big release that broke what earned
- You want to see how a team works before you hire it
Articles
-
A site that updates itself, and checks every page before it does
A new affiliate site publishes fresh data twice a day and new content every morning, with no one at the keyboard. How the automation works, and the one rule that makes it safe to leave alone.
-
Decide what success means before the test starts
One way of wording a title matches 28,413 searches a month; the other, 24. Before we test which wins, we write down how we will judge it. Why that order matters.
-
101 releases in 10 weeks, without breaking what earns
Speed and safety are usually traded off. On our current engagement we shipped 101 reviewed releases in 10 weeks on a site that earns every day. How.
-
From zero automated checks to 918 in under nine weeks
Sixteen weeks of a product had no automated checks. By its September release it had 918, and a gate that blocks any release when one fails. What we built, and the two times the safety net itself needed fixing.
-
Your investors will check your numbers
Traction is the story of the next round, and investors increasingly check it. Two real cases of numbers that looked fine and were not, and the checks that would have caught them before a board deck did.
-
Write the rulebook before the first page
Before building a new affiliate site, we audited 26 sites in its market against 13 rules. None of the affiliates met all of them. Why the rules came first, and how they became part of the build.
-
Building a school platform with an AI pair programmer
97 code changes, 74 of them written together with an AI coding assistant. How we built SuperEscuela’s student app and teacher records system, and the rules that kept the AI useful and the data safe.
-
Test the paths that have never run
A billing error would have given top-tier customers a fifth of what they paid for. It was waiting in a feature nobody could test yet. How one round of hands-on review found it, and 30 other problems, before the first invoice.
-
Proven, likely or unknown: a weekly report your CEO can trust
Most status reports mix facts, hopes and guesses in the same tone. Three labels fix that. How we write the weekly report on every engagement.
-
"Senior team or first hires? The first 90 days after a round"
After a raise, the instinct is to hire. Hiring is right, but it is slow, and the first months decide what the next round sees. When a senior team that ships from week one makes more sense, and how it should hand over.
Want a team
that works this way?
Tell us what you are working on. We will tell you how we would approach it, and what the first two weeks would look like.
Prefer to write directly? enable JavaScript to see the address